Also: Meta plunge, Jeff Zucker, and unions vs hospitals.
Good morning. David Meyer here in Berlin, filling in for Alan.
The energy transition is inevitably going to be messy in most places, and Europe is providing an early example of that phenomenon.
Environmental campaigners and some countries are livid after the European Commission decided natural gas and nuclear power will have to play a role in the EU’s transition to renewable energy sources. The bureaucratic “EU Taxonomy” decision will have a big impact on banks, insurers and so on, because it provides a benchmark for judging what investments are or aren’t “green”.
The eagle-eyed among you will have spotted that natural gas, while not quite as filthy as coal, is nonetheless a fossil fuel whose extraction and use has significant environmental impacts. And nuclear power may not contribute much to global warming, but its waste products are extremely dangerous and difficult to store, and accidents at nuclear plants can clearly be catastrophic.
The idea of a common framework for what counts as “green” is certainly to be welcomed in principle, because it’s a pretty confusing scene out there, in which it’s still easy to get away with greenwashing. But now the Commission is itself being accused of doing just that.
“Nuclear power is neither ‘green’ nor sustainable. I cannot understand the EU’s decision,” said Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer, making it clear that he supports his government’s plans to sue the Commission, and pledging that Austria will “continue to focus on the expansion of renewable energy sources.”
Luxembourg will join the suit, as might Germany, which is notably anti-nuclear (ironically leaving it highly dependent on coal) and pro-gas. France, meanwhile, is all-in on nuclear and not a fan of gas (which it doesn’t really need, because of its 56 nuclear plants—as long as they’re working) because of energy-security reasons. In essence, France was behind nuclear’s inclusion on the list, and Germany was behind gas’s inclusion. Now no-one’s happy.
“Gas is a fossil fuel. I know this,” EU Financial Services Commissioner Mairead McGuinness told reporters yesterday. “There is no ‘get out of jail’ here for nuclear or gas. We are stating very clearly: these are instruments in transition to allow us get where we need to be, which is more and more renewables.”
To be sure, the rules would force gas plants getting the Commission’s “green” label to fully switch to renewables by 2035, while countries using nuclear would need to have “a detailed plan to have in operation, by 2050, a disposal facility for high-level radioactive waste.” They wouldn’t be able to ship the radioactive waste overseas, either. But, as environmentalists point out, the length of time it currently takes to build nuclear plants make it questionable how much of an impact they could have on the energy transition.
“This anti-science plan represents the biggest greenwashing exercise of all time,” said Greenpeace EU campaigner Ariadna Rodrigo in a statement. “It makes a mockery of the EU’s claims to global leadership on climate and the environment. The inclusion of gas and nuclear in the taxonomy is increasingly difficult to explain as anything other than a giveaway to two desperate industries with powerful political friends.”
This debate is only going to intensify, particularly as the Commission’s proposals go through the European Parliament and those legal challenges. Also bear in mind that the likes of BlackRock and Santander have already pushed back against gas’s inclusion on the list, arguing that “there is no remaining carbon budget for new investments in natural gas.” So even if the Commission does clear the hurdles before it, the big question is whether financial institutions will take heed, or avoid classifying nuclear and/or gas as green to meet investors’ expectations.
More news below.
David Meyer
@superglaze
david.meyer@fortune.com
These stock picks are a must for 2022 Beat the market with Fortune’s new Investment Guide Read more.
Zuckerverse
Facebook parent Meta saw its share price lose as much as 23% of its value in after-hours trading, after investors responded negatively to Meta's tepid quarterly results. For one thing, Facebook's tally of daily active users has fallen for the first time ever, suggesting it's flatlined. For another, Apple's pro-privacy, anti-tracking changes are starting to bite. And it also turns out Meta spent $10 billion on metaverse-related projects last year, despite the fact that the concept won't be bringing in substantial revenue anytime soon. Fortune
Zucker worse
CNN president and WarnerMedia news and sports chief Jeff Zucker has stepped down, after admitting to a previously undisclosed romantic relationship with another senior CNN executive. The relationship became apparent during the investigation into Chris Cuomo's CNN tenure. Fortune
Unions vs hospitals
The Service Employees International Union, one of the U.S.'s biggest unions, has accused the hospital giant HCA Healthcare of "apparent Medicare fraud," as allegedly evidenced by its unusually high emergency room admission rates. HCA has rejected the allegations, which also include an accusation that the chain's practices "maximize profits at the expense of patient care, working conditions, and responsible corporate behavior." Fortune
Cancer moonshot
The White House is reviving an initiative, launched in 2016, that aims to improve U.S. cancer research, detection and prevention. Expect a "cancer cabinet" and new summits. And do read this republished essay by former Fortune editor Clifton Leaf, written at the time of the original launch, about what actually needs to be done to make greater leaps in the cancer struggle. Reuters
Climate change and the C-suite In a recent Deloitte Global survey of more than 2,000 CxOs across 21 countries, 89% of executives agreed there is a global climate emergency. Deloitte’s 2022 CxO Sustainability Report explores some of the disconnects between ambition, action, and impact, as well as steps CxOs can take to start to bridge the gaps. Read the report
GDPR problems
Belgium's data protection authority has decided that a very widely-used "consent solution" for getting people to submit to online tracking breaks the tough GDPR privacy law on several fronts. The tool was developed by the marketing and ad association IAB Europe, and is used by everyone from Google to Amazon—all of whom now have to delete the personal data they hoovered up through it. TechCrunch
NFT problems
Many users of the popular NFT marketplace OpenSea are reporting issues such as their NFTs being sold without their knowledge. Seems the platform is having trouble keeping up with its users' needs. Fortune
Bezos yacht
Jeff Bezos is having the world's biggest sailing yacht built for him by a Dutch company called Oceano, and when it's finished this summer it will need to get out onto the open seas. To facilitate that, the city of Rotterdam has agreed to temporarily dismantle a historic steel bridge called De Hef, which is a national monument that the city had previously pledged to never again dismantle. Washington Post
Spotify defense
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek has reportedly claimed his company doesn't edit Joe Rogan misinformative podcast because it is merely a platform distributing the show, not the show's publisher. It's an interesting defense, given that Rogan has a $100 million multiyear licensing deal with Spotify. L.A. Times
This edition of CEO Daily was edited by David Meyer.
Thanks for reading. If you liked this email, pay it forward. Share it with someone you know: Did someone share this with you? Sign up here. For previous editions, click here.
To view all of Fortune's newsletters on the latest in business, go here.
|  |
|
