Also: Publishing merger, remote work, and a new trade war?
Good morning. This is Peter Vanham in Lyon, France, filling in for Alan.
Is Elon Musk primarily a genius revolutionizing the world by making passenger cars greener? Or a harsh manager frightening employees and dividing society? After his whirlwind entry into Twitter last week, the debate between fans and detractors has flared up again. But one thing has already become clear: from an ESG perspective, this Musk is facing an uphill battle in improving his ESG score.
Back in May, a defiant Musk made headlines when Tesla got booted from S&P’s ESG Index, despite its stellar environmental impact. The company’s poor handling of traffic deaths, its difficult labor relations, and claims of racial discrimination sent it down to the bottom of the ranking. “ESG is a scam,” Musk said in response, claiming that the ratings agency “lost their integrity.”
If you were among those nodding in agreement with Musk, believing he had done more to revolutionize the car industry than any other company—and that Tesla’s environmental impact should outweigh any other consideration—you’d have found yourself in our company. What good is an ESG index, if it doesn’t acknowledge a company that singlehandedly changed the transport paradigm?
Today, however, we are starting to see the contours of an answer to this seemingly rhetorical question. First, we now know, ESG is not about impact, but about risk. On those grounds, Musk-operated companies will continue to face the specter of subpar ESG scores. Risk, governance issues, and social conflict are baked into his way of doing business. As early cases in point at Twitter:
• Late last night, Musk fired the company’s board of directors and made himself the board’s sole member, according to a company filing Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In terms of corporate governance, that’s a no-no. Should Twitter have been a public company, the decision surely would have earned it a meager score on the “G” of ESG.
• Earlier this week, tech site The Verge also reported that “Elon Musk has given employees their first ultimatum: Meet his deadline to introduce paid verification on Twitter or pack up and leave.” On the “S” aspect of ESG, these and other threats made publicly by Musk to employees would also be a no-go. Social governance of a company is meant to be based on respecting employees, not threatening them.
• Finally, a series of slip-ups by Twitter’s new owner show the broader societal risks of having limited governance. Following the attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, for example, Musk responded, “There is a tiny possibility there might be more to this story than meets the eye,” linking to an article promoting an unfounded conspiracy theory about the attack on Paul Pelosi. That tweet later disappeared, but these and other Musk tweets have only fueled societal discord in recent months.
With hindsight, do these incidents vindicate S&P in its assessment of Musk’s Tesla?
In a written statement, S&P told me yesterday: “Tesla’s exclusion was determined by an independent index committee within S&P DJI that follows a rules-based published methodology.” That statement can’t take away the environmental revolution Musk has started at Tesla, but following a rules-based published methodology sure is a form of integrity—and one Twitter will need to succeed in the future.
More news below.
Peter Vanham
@petervanham
peter.vanham@fortune.com
|
|
|
Leaders Follow Fortune - Be Better at Business for just $1 Subscribe to Fortune.com today and unlock market-moving business news, our iconic lists and rankings, including the Fortune 500, exclusive investment guides and more. Try Today |
|
|
Publishing merger
The Justice Department has won a court ruling upholding its arguments against Penguin Random House’s $2.2 billion takeover of Simon & Schuster. U.S. District Judge Florence Pan: “The Court finds that the United States has shown that the effect of the proposed merger may be substantially to lessen competition in the market for the U.S. publishing rights to anticipated top-selling books.” Wall Street Journal
Remote work
In the battle for talent, employers may be regaining the upper hand, according to new LinkedIn research that suggests remote roles are in decline after gaining popularity during the pandemic. The company also surveyed thousands of C-level executives and found many companies are reversing progress on things like flexibility and employee wellbeing. World Economic Forum
Trade war?
A potential trade war between the U.S. and EU is brewing over electric cars. The U.S.’s recent Inflation Reduction Act offers tax credits that incentivize people to “buy American,” which is understandably seen in Europe as a protectionist measure. Germany and France are contemplating a “Buy European Act” in retaliation if European EVs don’t qualify for the scheme. Politico
|
|
|
2022 Deloitte holiday survey According to Deloitte’s 2022 holiday retail and travel survey, consumers will be finding ways to keep the holiday spirit alive despite economic pressures. How might you prepare your company to engage with consumers’ evolving spending priorities this year? Explore the findings.
|
|
|
Sign up for The Trust Factor ✉️ The Trust Factor is your weekly guide to understanding the new KPI business leaders need to succeed, from gaining consumer confidence to mitigating digital risk. Get it delivered to your inbox |
|
|
Thanks for reading. If you liked this email, pay it forward. Share it with someone you know. Did someone share this with you? Sign up here. For previous editions, click here.
To view all of Fortune's newsletters on the latest in business, go here.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
