Also: Banking's woes, Twitter's valuation, remote work's future Good morning,
I was vacationing with family last week and paid little attention to flighty bank deposits or gyrating bank stocks. Fortunately, there were no new bank runs, but markets and regulators remain nervous about what’s to come. Up in the air: whether current bank troubles will cause a broader credit crunch that slows the economy.
But my question for the morning is this: Once the crisis is past, who will enforce discipline in the banking system? The likely candidates all seem to have disqualified themselves:
• Depositors. It was probably foolish to think that uninsured depositors would be a prime source of discipline for misbehaving banks, particularly in a case like Silicon Vally Bank, where customers were effectively required to hold deposits at the bank in return for loans and services. But by promising to bail out all the failed banks’ depositors, regulators have taken depositor discipline almost entirely off the table. (I say “almost” because regulators are still waffling on exactly who is covered by the deposit guarantee.)
• Investors. Kudos to the short sellers who saw this coming, and profited as a result. But their numbers were too small to be an effective police force against bank misbehavior.
• Regulators. We now know it was an error (if not an act of policy malpractice) to set $250 billion as the threshold for “systemically important” banks. The failed banks fell below that level but were declared systemically important all the same. Even more disturbing is the revelation that regulators probably wouldn’t have caught the problem anyway. Why? Because their “stress tests” didn’t deal with a rapidly rising interest rate scenario.
That last revelation is particularly disturbing. (You can read more about it in Shawn Tully’s excellent piece here.) We’ve known for over a decade that we were in a historically unprecedented era of low interest rates–and that a return to the norm would be likely, if not inevitable. So why would the Fed not “stress test” banks for the effects of higher rates? The Wall Street Journal attempts to explain the failure this weekend here. But it still boggles the mind.
Market failure is the best argument for imposing regulation. And regulatory failure is the best argument for imposing market discipline. But what happens when both fail? That’s the unanswered question.
More news below.
Alan Murray @alansmurray
|
|
|
Twitter’s new valuation
Elon Musk has offered equity grants to Twitter employees, which values the company at $20 billion. This is significantly less than the $44 billion Musk paid to acquire the social media platform. The move may be an effort to retain staff amidst recent job cuts and uncertainty about the company's future. Bloomberg
Remote work still strong
Despite pressure to return to the office from execs, new data from economists show that remote work is picking up steam in U.S. metro areas. Job postings for roles that are “remote-friendly” are at record level highs. Investors worry that the current banking crisis and the desire for remote work will harm commercial real estate owners. Bloomberg
Wine funding fears
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank has left wineries, which heavily relied on its wine division receiving more than $4 billion in loans, in a sticky situation. The relationship between start-ups and wine worked because of the clubbiness and the opportunities for generating relationships. At its crash, SVB was sitting on $1.2 billion in wine loans. Financial Times
|
|
|
Navigating the ever-changing future of work As many organizations continue to grapple with discontinuity and disruption, how might business leaders influence and respond to change as workplaces evolve and present new challenges? Explore insights on navigating this new boundaryless world in Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends report. Read more.
|
| |
Check out what's new from Fortune! |
An investment in your career that pays dividends Fortune Connect is the new, cutting-edge leadership development community designed for the next generation of purpose-driven leaders who want to change business for good. Ready to accelerate your career? Learn more |
|
|
Thanks for reading. If you liked this email, pay it forward. Share it with someone you know. Did someone share this with you? Sign up here. For previous editions, click here. To view all of Fortune's newsletters on the latest in business, go here.
|
|
| | |