Also: Amer Sports IPO, social media in the Senate, Paytm plunge
Good morning.
Was the richest person in the world overpaid? That’s the question Delaware Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick asked and answered in the affirmative on Tuesday. Her 200-page decision makes raucous reading; I’d recommend it here.
In a world where the average Fortune 500 CEO makes 350 times the average employee, one might conclude that anything goes. But Musk’s 2018 Tesla pay package exceeded anything previously seen. With a $55.8 billion maximum value and a $2.6 billion grant date fair value, the plan was 250 times larger than the median peer CEO package, and 33 times larger than the nearest comparison—which was Musk’s prior compensation plan.
But size was not the real issue here. Process was. There was apparently no substantive discussion by the board or its compensation committee about the size of the package, no serious evaluation of alternatives, no peer comparison study used to evaluate it. The board claimed to be motivated by concerns Musk might step down, and it probably should have been motivated by the possibility Musk would spend too much time on his many other projects. But no effort was made to tie the exorbitant pay to a requirement that he spend all or even a substantial amount of his time at Tesla.
Then there is the question of director independence. The judge’s conclusion: “Five of the six directors who voted on the grant were beholden to Musk or had compromising conflicts”…most of which were undisclosed. Ira Ehrenpreis, chair of the compensation committee, is a close friend of Musk’s brother Kimball and an investor in his company. Antonio Gracias, a member of the committee, vacations frequently with Musk, has spent holidays with him, and once loaned him $1 million and can’t remember if he charged interest. Robyn Denholm and Brad Buss are dependent on Musk’s companies for most of their net worth. All of them ought to step down in wake of this decision. And as for the one person on the board who appears to be somewhat independent—James Murdoch—the question is: Where was he?
Musk’s assertion that the Delaware court has turned unfriendly to business is absurd. The reason most companies incorporate in Delaware is because the opposite is true. Will this decision change that? I doubt it. Directors of other companies who read this decision will scoff at how ludicrous the Tesla board’s process was, and take comfort theirs isn’t nearly so bad. I’ve always been puzzled by the meaning of the phrase “the exception that proves the rule,” but this may be an example. The only lesson here is that Tesla’s board operates in a different universe, and needs to be brought back to earth.
Other news below
Alan Murray
@alansmurray
alan.murray@fortune.com
|
|
|
Provide your feedback on CEO Daily |
Fortune is interested in your views on this newsletter. Please click here if you would be happy to take a short survey sharing your opinions. Please note that by clicking this link your email address will be pre-populated for you and linked with any responses you choose to provide. Fortune’s Privacy Policy is available here. |
|
|
The first big IPO of 2024 underdelivers
Amer Sports, the company behind products like Wilson tennis rackets and Arc'teryx jackets, raised $1.3 billion in the U.S.’s first major IPO of 2024. The sports manufacturer, owned by Chinese sports giant Anta Sports, sold shares at $13, below its marketed range of $16 to $18. The IPO values Amer Sports at $6.3 billion. Bloomberg
Social media gets dragged to the Senate
U.S. senators on Wednesday grilled social media CEOs like Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg and TikTok’s Shou Zi Chew on child safety policies. Lawmakers accused tech companies of abusing Section 230, which shields platforms from liability for user-submitted content. Executives cited recent efforts to improve moderation and protect underage users, but senators noted that companies had implemented some of those measures only days ago. Fortune
Paytm shares plunge
Shares in One97 Communications—better known as the owner of popular Indian payments app Paytm—plunged by 20% after India’s central bank ordered the company’s affiliated banking service to stop accepting new deposits. The Reserve Bank of India accused Paytm Payments Bank of persistent non-compliance. One97 Communications warned that the RBI’s order could reduce the company’s annual earnings by as much as $60 million going forward. Reuters
|
|
|
EV Momentum Slows Down According to Deloitte’s 2024 Global Automotive Consumer Study, intent to purchase an internal combustion engine (ICE) in the U.S. is up by 9% while EV intent has fallen by 1%. What impact will this have on electrification amid evolving customer expectations and economic headwinds? Read more.
|
|
|
Elevate your business strategy in 2024 with Fortune Analytics |
Fortune Analytics gives you access to the data behind the Fortune 500. Discover new opportunities with the market-sizing and industry-focused analysis you need - including contact information for all decision makers. Download your FREE sample today |
|
|
Thanks for reading. If you liked this email, pay it forward. Share it with someone you know. Did someone share this with you? Sign up here. For previous editions, click here.
To view all of Fortune's newsletters on the latest in business, go here.
|
|
|
|
 |
