PRIME TIME BEGINS — The Public Order Emergency Commission is an exhaustive exercise in patience. Or exhausting, depending on your access to caffeine. Justice PAUL ROULEAU is constantly fighting the clock. When he calls today's hearing to order, Rouleau will have 75 days to submit his final report to Cabinet. It's a tall order given the complexity of the multi-jurisdictional response to border blockades and the weeks-long occupation of downtown Ottawa. Dozens of interviews. Hundreds of hours of testimony. Thousands of pages of documents. — Clock is ticking: The justice admonishes lawyers for blowing past their allotted time, but he often allows them just one more query, as long as they promise to wrap up soon. BRENDAN MILLER, the lawyer repping the convoy organizers, is a repeat offender. — Big name witnesses: On Monday, the commission heard from a panel of senior intelligence officials and Emergency Preparedness Minister BILL BLAIR — the first Cabinet minister in the hot seat. Lawyers guide witnesses through exhibits — redacted reports, email threads, text messages. Sometimes the context of the documents is missing. They poke and prod witnesses' recollections. They ask for elaboration and interpretation. It's a slow process. Witnesses sometimes claim to simply have forgotten key details in the sands of time. Monday was nearly an 11-hour day for the commission, 9:30 a.m. to just past 8 p.m. The commission's hearings are scheduled to wrap up Friday. Rouleau's inquiry still has to hear from Prime Minister JUSTIN TRUDEAU, three of his senior staffers and six of his ministers. THE HEADLINE — Canadian Security Intelligence Service director DAVID VIGNEAULT confirmed that he advised the prime minister at a February meeting to invoke the Emergencies Act. He offered that counsel despite CSIS's opinion that the convoy protest itself did not pose a threat to Canada's security according to the CSIS definition. — The nuance: Some observers might call that a contradiction. Vigneault told the commission his advice to the PM was based not solely on his view as CSIS director, but as a national security adviser more broadly who was listening to voices all around the Cabinet table — and also to lawyers from the Department of Justice. — Clear as mud: A public summary of a commission interview with Vigneault explained his advice to the PM. Try to follow these words: "Mr. Vigneault explained that based on both his understanding that the Emergencies Act definition of threat to the security of Canada was broader than the CSIS Act, as well as based on his opinion of everything he had seen to that point, he advised the Prime Minister of his belief that it was indeed required to invoke the Act." More than one lawyer asked Vigneault what he meant by "it" in the last sentence. Vigneault couldn't really say. That's the kind of day it was. — Who's up next: Public Safety Minister MARCO MENDICINO and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister DOMINIC LEBLANC are Tuesday's headliners. Further reading: The Toronto Sun's BRIAN LILLEY says senior bureaucrats are reinventing the definition of a national security threat … The National Post's JOHN IVISON called it an "elastic" definition … The Toronto Star reports on Blair's testimony . Did someone forward you this free newsletter? Sign up for your own copy to keep up with the latest insights and analysis from inside Ottawa politics.
|