RIGHT ARGUES OVER POST-ROE STRATEGY — Several red states are poised to pass 15-week abortion bans as soon as this week, mirroring a Mississippi law the Supreme Court could soon deem constitutional. That’s to say they aren’t taking the Texas tack and banning all abortions after six weeks, Megan Messerly and Alice Miranda Ollstein write. Advocates of the 15-week approach, which is advancing in Arizona, Florida and West Virginia, see it as politically and legally safer. Conservatives feel confident the Supreme Court will either eliminate or limit Roe v. Wade later this year and are concerned the Texas law could be undone by ongoing legal challenges. Arizona state Sen. Nancy Barto on the Senate floor last week said that while she believes “every life should be protected,” 15 weeks is a “common sense limit” and a “step in the right direction.” Everyone isn’t on the same page, though. Some anti-abortion-rights advocates believe states should be going further. “Some national and state groups believe we should proceed cautiously and strategically,” said Kristi Hamrick, the spokesperson for Students for Life of America, which is pushing bills in dozens of states that mirror Texas’, and outlaw the use of abortion pills early in pregnancy. “We respectfully disagree.” Meanwhile, abortion-rights advocates likely don’t have the votes to stop 15-week bans from moving forward and are struggling to convince a distracted and exhausted public to mobilize against the policies. VAX PASSPORT TECH TAKES OFF IN RED STATES — Many Republican-leaning states that had eschewed vaccine passports over fears that they would infringe on people’s freedom are now turning to the technology behind them to allow their residents to travel and get digital immunization and health records, POLITICO’s Ben Leonard reports. The tech is gaining steam in at least five states — Arizona, Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma and Utah — despite bans against “passports” or governor opposition, in the case of Mississippi. These states aren’t planning on requiring them for indoor dining or entertainment venues a’la New York City or Los Angeles, and they’re not labeling them “passports,” a now-politically charged term. “We're starting to see some jurisdictions that had a very strict stance, ‘We're not going to put any QR codes on anything,’ look at this again with fresh eyes and say, ‘Okay, this really isn't a passport. This is really just an evolution of a record moving into the digital age,’” said Rebecca Coyle, executive director of the American Immunization Registry Association. PR moves: Many are rolling them out with little to no fanfare. Some states like Utah aren’t heavily advertising the technology, with some officials deeming a marketing push politically unpalatable. “They were hesitant because it looked like the state was pushing a vaccine passport,” said Jon Reid, the manager of Utah's immunization information system. On the other hand, South Carolina won’t be shy about its digital credentials when they are expected to launch by the end of the March, said Stephen White, director of the immunization division at the state’s health department, with plans to advertise on social media and via press release. The shifting attitude in the once-hesitant states highlights the draw of digital records for states and the growing desire for patients to have access to their health information. De facto standard: The Biden administration said last spring it would issue standards for vaccine credentials, but has not, leaving states to work in a patchwork manner on the technology. But the Vaccination Credential Initiative’s SMART Health Cards have emerged as a de facto standard, with 20-plus states developing the technology or already launching it.
|