A 2023 HEALTH AGENDA — Republicans, poised to take control of the House, are already planning their first moves in the new Congress. Outside of abortion, healthcare topics — and the pandemic in particular — were conspicuously absent from a number of campaigns during the midterms. But new GOP strategies are likely to change that. House Republicans are already planning investigations into the government’s pandemic response, according to a House GOP aide granted anonymity to freely discuss the plans with Pulse. Other priorities include addressing fentanyl’s role in the opioid crisis and reigning in the Biden administration’s pandemic responses. Senate Republicans share many of those targets. The office of Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas), who is on the Senate HELP Committee, told Pulse in a statement Wednesday that a top priority for his GOP brethren is investigating the origins and responses to Covid-19, among plans to lower health costs and spur innovation among drugmakers. Many of the Republicans’ goals will be out of reach without the power to override a veto, but a few issues still remain top of mind. Oversight, oversight, oversight: “Thanks for coming out to Dr. Fauci’s retirement party!” Sen. Rand Paul said Tuesday after being reelected to his Kentucky seat. The quip was a sign of the direction Republicans might take next year as they try to keep the investigations into the Biden administration’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic front and center ahead of the 2024 presidential election. The House Oversight and Reform Committee will likely probe Covid-19’s origins , including the CDC’s pandemic response, how pandemic relief dollars have been spent and Anthony Fauci’s role in approving research programs considered controversial among Republicans. House Republican leadership elections are scheduled for Nov. 15 , and Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), currently the committee’s ranking member, is in line to take the gavel. The House Energy and Commerce Committee also plans to look into the Biden administration’s Covid-19 policies, including school shutdowns and HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra’s plans to implement the new drug price controls. The future of federal Covid responses: Attempts earlier this year to pass legislation for additional funding to fight Covid-19 (and monkeypox) were dealt a blow by GOP leadership , and President Joe Biden’s comment that the pandemic was over added to resistance to allocating more money for the public health response. “President Biden stated that the pandemic is over: amidst the massive inflation, his administration shouldn’t expect any more emergency funding for the Covid public health emergency,” the Republican aide said in a text to Pulse. Republicans have repeatedly called for ending the public health emergency, which could have a cascading effect on the healthcare system. GOP lawmakers want to curb spending and say Biden is “clinging to his emergency powers.” Those calls will likely continue, along with attempts to end the national emergency declaration, which is separate from the PHE. Biden has said he would veto the proposal . WELCOME TO THURSDAY PULSE, where we hope you have some interesting post-midterm plans to share with us. Send them — along with tips and news — to dpayne@politico.com and kmahr@politico.com. TODAY ON OUR PULSE CHECK PODCAST, Ruth Reader talks with Grace Scullion about a coming Supreme Court decision that could have broad implications for who is accountable for ensuring individual rights to federally funded services. Plus, Chris Murray, director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, on his new study that estimates immunity to Covid-19 by country.
|