The birth of a new crypto threat to government

From: POLITICO's Digital Future Daily - Thursday Feb 02,2023 09:56 pm
How the next wave of technology is upending the global economy and its power structures
Feb 02, 2023 View in browser
 
POLITICO's Digital Future Daily newsletter logo

By Ben Schreckinger

An anti-government protester is carried on shoulders.

Arab Spring protestors holding phones and flags. | Chris Hondros/Getty Images

If the spread of social media to the Middle East sparked the Arab Spring, imagine what will happen when people get their hands on crypto tools that allow them to send money, form groups and enter into financial contracts — all with more secrecy than Bitcoin provides. 

That’s the startling pitch from Amir Taaki, an early Bitcoin developer now working with an international group of anarchist coders on next-generation software designed to find out. The coders believe their system will present a graver threat to governments than other internet advances of the past 20 years. 

The group is preparing to launch a testnet, a critical early milestone on the path to releasing a finished product, as soon as Thursday afternoon, according to several members and the text of a draft announcement shared first with POLITICO. 

Fourteen years after Bitcoin’s release, law enforcement and cybersecurity officials continue to grapple with the fallout from the first generation of cryptocurrency-related technology — from money laundering, to unregistered securities offerings, to ransomware attacks. But even as regulators and law enforcement figure out how to handle the first wave of blockchain networks, developers around the world are racing to deploy more advanced variations on the original concept. 

While many of these next-generation tools are being designed to ensure greater legal compliance than their predecessors — or even for use by governments themselves, as crypto’s underlying technology grows in legitimacy and institutional heft — the planned launch shows that radical anti-government ideas remain a driving force in the evolution of many crypto networks.

The anarchist project calls itself DarkFi, a reference both to “DeFi” — the nickname for crypto-based decentralized finance — and a 2014 speech by former FBI Director James Comey about the “Going Dark” problem that widespread encryption presented for law enforcement agencies hoping to surveil digital activity. 

Representatives of the group say its members are spread across parts of Europe and the Middle East. Though they frame the software as a tool for shielding users from government-imposed violence, law enforcement officials say the proliferation of enhanced encryption is making it harder to catch drug dealers, terrorists and human traffickers 

This all troubles Bill Callahan, a former Drug Enforcement Administration agent who oversaw money laundering investigations during a two-decade stint at the agency. He said that the potential for advanced encryption to cloak crime is worrisome — and that for the sake of public safety, new encryption tools need to strike a balance between personal freedom and government oversight.

“We have a reasonable expectation of privacy,” said Callahan, who now works at Blockchain Intelligence Group, which conducts forensic investigations of crypto activity. “We don’t have an absolute expectation of privacy.” 

Like many of the newer crypto tools being developed for use by governments and legally compliant businesses, the DarkFi project leans heavily on zero-knowledge proofs, a cryptographic technique invented by mathematicians in the 1980s that allows for targeted verification of encrypted information in a way that allows most aspects of the information to remain secret. 

Experts who reviewed DarkFi’s announcement and its website at POLITICO’s request said the project appeared to be technically sophisticated, even as they expressed skepticism of its developers’ vision. 

In a sense, the idea is an extension of the mission of the original cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, which was invented specifically to challenge government control of money and banking. As it has spread and gained wider adoption, governments have found ways to mitigate the threat posed by the original cryptocurrency and its immediate successors.

And developers are still trying to perfect blockchain systems that integrate next-generation functionality and secrecy in a single system. Doing so will help fulfill “the destiny of crypto,” Taaki said, to bring about individual freedom at the expense of governments. 

Matthew Green, a Johns Hopkins computer science professor who was instrumental in the development of the privacy-focused cryptocurrency ZCash, said that he, too, believes that advances in encryption and network design could bring further crypto-driven disruption. But, at least, for now, he said governments have shown they can and will find ways to crack down on networks used for criminal activities.

“We’re more in the taking-the-cap-off-of-the-toothpaste phase,” he said. “The toothpaste won’t be out of the tube probably for 10 years.”

Read the rest of the story here.

 

JOIN POLITICO ON 2/9 TO HEAR FROM AMERICA’S GOVERNORS: In a divided Congress, more legislative and policy enforcement will shift to the states, meaning governors will take a leading role in setting the agenda for the nation. Join POLITICO on Thursday, Feb. 9 at World Wide Technology's D.C. Innovation Center for The Fifty: America's Governors, where we will examine where innovations are taking shape and new regulatory red lines, the future of reproductive health, and how climate change is being addressed across a series of one-on-one interviews. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
THE FUTURE WILL COME WITH MONTHLY FEES

The high-tech darling ChatGPT now has something in common with Spotify and Zoom. They all operate on a “freemium” model: users get the basics for no cost and access to premium functionality for a subscription fee.

In case you (somehow) missed it: yesterday, OpenAI announced its entry into the subscription economy with a $20/month subscription to ChatGPT, its impressive chatbot, built on a family of large generative language models. You can still sign up for free and crank out songs in the style of Nick Cave or ask it to explain code to you, but the company promises paying s better access to the AI service during peak times, plus priority use of new features and faster response times.

If you’re thinking, “Wow, that was fast,” you’d be right. ChatGPT only launched in November; even Spotify, a company that wanted to go subscription-based from the beginning, waited 6 months before early adopters saw restrictions on their free accounts. But then again, ChatGPT just set the record yesterday for the fastest growing consumer application in history.

If this all sounds a little pedestrian for a company that’s already triggering serious debates about changing the industry, the economy and humanity, keep in mind that OpenAI is still a tech company (although one with a slightly unusual structure), and investors have shown a lot of love for subscription-based Software-as-a-Service (Saas) businesses for a decade now. That model means predictable, recurring revenue from a user base without relying on finicky things like ad impressions.

In the meantime, if you’re still looking for a free, fast version of ChatGPT, you might have to head to Microsoft’s Bing.  Mohar Chatterjee

TO BE A CITIZEN, NOT A SUBJECT

A man from the Ukrainian town Svaliava shows to the photographer the newest pictures shared on social media.

A man from the Ukrainian town Svaliava shows to the photographer the newest pictures shared on social media. | Zuzana Gogova/Getty Images

In the very active debate about online content moderation — with former Twitter executives set up for a theatrical grilling in Washington next week about how they dealt with politically controversial content on their platforms — it's worth thinking about the bigger questions of how, or what, platforms are supposed to moderate.

An interesting recent insight came from Ethan Zuckerman (internet personality, University of Massachusetts Amherst professor, regretful inventor of the pop-up ad), who wrote a blog post last September where he argued that online spaces needed governance, not moderation.

You can read that post here, but the gist is that he worries that people have accepted being “subjects” of large internet companies, with decisions made by “people half a world away, guided by opaque algorithms.”

He argues that the public conversation would be a lot better if people acted more as “citizens” of the platforms they frequent. This means putting the job of governing social media platforms into the hands of its most dedicated users. (Not that the tech giants are likely to change. Zuckerman and his collaborators have been building and launching small, user-governed social networks to encourage the idea.)

One takeaway from his whole argument: Zuckerman suggests that consumer costs, in dollars or (unpaid) labor, define the kind of digital public discourse we get. By paying nothing, either in time or money, we got the “public sphere that we have paid for” — one that “puts us under perpetual surveillance” and “amps up our worst tendencies.”

But then again, when he wrote his post in September 2022, Zuckerman couldn’t have known that you could pay $8 to be a verified human on Twitter and still be subjected to sketchy content moderation policies. — Mohar Chatterjee

Tweet of the Day

Meme about Netflix subscription update:

User tweet about Netflix subscription update. | @yyznaho on Twitter

The Future in 5 Links

***FOOTER***Stay in touch with the whole team: Ben Schreckinger (bschreckinger@politico.com); Derek Robertson (drobertson@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); and Benton Ives (bives@politico.com). Follow us @DigitalFuture on Twitter.

If you’ve had this newsletter forwarded to you, you can sign up and read our mission statement at the links provided.

 

DOWNLOAD THE POLITICO MOBILE APP: Stay up to speed with the newly updated POLITICO mobile app, featuring timely political news, insights and analysis from the best journalists in the business. The sleek and navigable design offers a convenient way to access POLITICO's scoops and groundbreaking reporting. Don’t miss out on the app you can rely on for the news you need, reimagined. DOWNLOAD FOR iOSDOWNLOAD FOR ANDROID.

 
 
 

Follow us on Twitter

Ben Schreckinger @SchreckReports

Derek Robertson @afternoondelete

Steve Heuser @sfheuser

Benton Ives @BentonIves

 

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Instagram Listen on Apple Podcast
 

To change your alert settings, please log in at https://www.politico.com/_login?base=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com/settings

This email was sent to by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

Please click here and follow the steps to .

More emails from POLITICO's Digital Future Daily

Jan 31,2023 09:33 pm - Tuesday

How (not) to future-proof the law

Jan 30,2023 09:01 pm - Monday

2023's crypto characters to watch

Jan 27,2023 09:22 pm - Friday

5 questions with IBM's Christina Montgomery

Jan 26,2023 10:18 pm - Thursday

Tech's strange D.C. alliances

Jan 25,2023 09:01 pm - Wednesday

Should a robot be allowed to kill you?

Jan 24,2023 09:14 pm - Tuesday

The fight for the airwaves in your house