BABY NOW WE GOT BAD BLOOD — Moderna unleashed a tweetstorm Thursday defending its decision not to include three government scientists on its Covid vaccine patent filing, POLITICO’s Sarah Owermohle writes, the latest altercation in its public battle with the Biden administration over its obligations to American taxpayers and global citizens. The backstory: National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins told Reuters this week that the U.S. plans to fight for those scientists to be included on the patent. Federal officials worked alongside the company in the pandemic’s early days, sharing resources and know-how in hopes of quickly developing an effective vaccine against the novel virus. But by the summer of 2021, the administration began losing patience with Moderna’s obstinance against sending doses to low- and middle-income countries that couldn’t pay top dollar for them, as Sarah and POLITICO’s Adam Cancryn and Erin Banco reported last week. What Moderna says: The company argues that the NIH scientists were not part of selecting the messenger RNA sequence — the secret sauce Moderna wants to protect via patent — that became the Covid-19 shot in use today. Moderna “has recognized the substantial role that the NIAID has played” in the vaccine development by including those scientists on other patents but “just because someone is an inventor on one patent application relating to our COVID-19 vaccine does not mean they are an inventor on every patent application relating to the vaccine,” it tweeted. “For those who would seek to twist Moderna’s good faith application of U.S. patent law, nothing could be further from the truth,” the company added. “Moderna remains the only company to have pledged not to enforce its COVID-19 intellectual property during the pandemic.” NOVAVAX ADDS LOBBYING POWER — Vaccine developer Novavax added a fourth lobbying firm to its roster of outside influence shops, POLITICO’s Megan R. Wilson reports. Lobbyists at Crowell & Moring will be working on "issues related to vaccine policy," per disclosure forms. Novavax and lobbyists at the firm didn't respond to a request for more details about the work. POLITICO reported last month that the company has been running into production and quality problems with its protein-based Covid-19 vaccine that make it unable to pass muster with U.S. regulators, but Novavax expects to apply for FDA for emergency authorization by the end of the year. Lobbyists on the account include Kate Beale, a former top lobbyist at PhRMA and Obama-era official at the U.S. Agency for International Development, and Jim Flood, former counsel for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. IS THERE A LINK BETWEEN LONG COVID AND ALZHEIMER’S? — One aspect of long Covid that researchers are watching is whether there’s a connection between the cognitive symptoms some patients experience and the biological changes some Alzheimer’s experts believe contribute to the disease. A consortium of international researchers has been meeting regularly to compare notes on what doctors are seeing in so-called long-haulers with neurological complications like brain fog and other impairments, Heather Snyder, the Alzheimer’s Association vice president of medical and scientific relations, told Lauren from the sidelines of this week’s Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Disease conference. The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio is recruiting 900 adults who have recovered from Covid to study why some experience prolonged symptoms or develop new ones after their acute infections resolve. Some participants in the study, which is part of NIH’s long Covid initiative, with neurological symptoms will receive MRIs and spinal taps to try to ascertain why those symptoms develop or persist. Researchers in locations from Argentina to New York have reported changes in the underlying biologies of long Covid patients experiencing cognitive impairments that are associated with Alzheimer’s, like the clumping of proteins in the brain. What’s still unknown, Snyder said, is whether that’s temporary, or if those individuals are somehow predisposed to developing the disease. “It does underscore the need to continue to look at this relationship, understand what this relationship might be in terms of, does it impact a person’s risk,” she said. “We have to be asking these questions, and we have to understand what that long-term impact is on the brain.” |