Tom Steyer is again putting his money where his mouth is. The 2020 presidential candidate, climate evangelist and California political bankroller launched a new real estate "investment strategy" this month under the umbrella of his investment firm, Galvanize Climate Solutions. He's planning to buy and retrofit multifamily housing, industrial buildings, student housing and self storage units, and has hired Goldman Sachs real estate veteran Joe Sumberg to oversee the strategy. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. You're in San Francisco, where the downtown is not doing great. Is this a good time to get into commercial real estate? We're going to be doing real estate, but that doesn't mean we're going to be doing office buildings. That could include multifamily. That can include student housing, that can include industrial. Obviously, if you live in San Francisco, because I think we're sort of the eye of the storm, there's a real question about not whether there's a need for commercial real estate, but how much of a need is there for commercial real estate in terms of square feet. And obviously in markets where there is as much demand as there is supply, then a whole bunch of things happen, including when vacancies go up, and that means rents go down and all kinds of valuation issues come into play. It's not trivial to take a big office building and, okay, if it's not going to be an office building, what the heck is it going to be? How are you going to make money at this? What are the risks and what are the returns that you're expecting? Real estate is a huge investment area. And within that we believe that this strategy of actually doing sustainable real estate is something which is going to have higher returns that has a huge tailwind to it. We believe that the climate response is a gigantic investable area. We're dedicated to climate response, but we also believe that it will lead to higher returns because it has to happen and there's a huge demand for it. You're planning to focus on the Pacific Northwest, Colorado, California, Arizona and Texas. What's driving that: policy, high real-estate values, exposure to climate vulnerabilities? Econ 101: Location, location, location. You want to be in places that have the characteristics of a positive market to be in. Part of that is just regular old real estate. And part of it is we want to be in places where we're going to be able to put this through in a way so that we make sure that it adds the returns. When Joe's talking about it, he's looking at places where we can make good real estate investments and dramatically reduce carbon footprints and have better returns as a result. Are you counting on the Inflation Reduction Act for anything? We have people who are policy experts looking specifically at the IRA and all the other things, but our basic attitude is we need to invest in terms of the framework that exists today. The investable proposition is here is the world we're in. This is how we're going to get returns. Were there any political wins from Prop. 39, your 2012 California ballot initiative to raise money for school retrofits? Do you think that the IRA will benefit Democrats? Let me put it to you this way. Do you think that doing the right thing for the citizens of California, or the citizens of the United States, is a good thing to do politically or not? Clean up our air, specifically work to try and help the people who've been most disadvantaged in terms of environmental harm, and basically help solve a gigantic global crisis. Is that good politics? Prop. 39 specifically was supposed to help people. The IRA is specifically supposed to help people. If you succeed in specifically helping people and they recognize it, is that good politics? I guess so. Isn't that what democracy is supposed to be?
|