HEADWINDS — Offshore wind is facing a pivotal moment as Northeast states that have made the technology a focus of their clean energy goals on the technology are facing pressure from developers to provide more aid or risk losing projects. Now even cheerleading officials in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and other states can’t ignore the high costs that could be passed to ratepayers, potentially jeopardizing the Biden administration’s climate targets. It’s forcing some tough decisions. Regulators need to decide whether they will acquiesce to wind companies demanding more public subsidies to maintain existing contracts for planned projects, citing rising costs due to inflation and supply chain constraints. New York rejected such a request just last week, Marie J. French reports. “These projects are not everything. They do not represent the entirety of our efforts to fight climate change,” said New York Public Service Commission Chair Rory Christian. “They’re one part of our portfolio, and as with any portfolio, different assets produce different results.” State and federal officials are just starting to grapple with the ramifications — and how to handle the options for trying to save an industry under intense pressure. The governors of Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut unveiled a new agreement earlier this month to coordinate offshore wind development as wind companies raise the possibility of withdrawing their plans to install hundreds of turbines along the Atlantic Coast. The agreement will allow the New England states to jointly solicit offshore wind proposals from developers to help cut costs after multiple projects were terminated earlier this year, Benjamin Storrow at POLITICO’s E&E News reports. It’s also a cautionary tale as the Biden administration looks to site offshore wind areas and lease acres of water off the coasts of Gulf Coast and Western states while spurring a domestic supply chain industry for turbines, large vessels and the workforce needed to build it all. Already, the administration has had to slow its roll for offshore wind in Oregon after members of Congress relayed concerns from fishing and tribal communities about planned offshore wind leases in that state. “The U.S. targets of 30 GW by 2030 are further from reality,” said Atin Jain, an analyst who tracks the offshore wind industry at BloombergNEF. “I’ve been saying it was a pipe dream at the beginning of the year. My opinion has just become stronger.”
|