Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. With Allie Bice. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Alex | Email Tina | Email Max The Drudge Report made its name by making life hell for Democrats in the White House. But over the past several months, the website, named after its infamous and enigmatic founder MATT DRUDGE, has continued the surprising trend that emerged during the 2020 presidential campaign: Taking a relatively muted editorial stance on JOE BIDEN. Readers who visited Drudge on the morning of Dec. 10, found a patriotic graphic of Biden splashed against an American flag leading the site. Headlines on that day touted the “lowest jobless claims in 50 years,” “Biden delivering fastest recovery in history?” and quotes from CNBC host JIM CRAMER saying the economy was the “strongest I’ve ever seen.” On Dec. 21, the site linked to a report about former President DONALD TRUMP’s relationship with convicted sex offender JEFFREY EPSTEIN while promoting a story about Biden’s new dog and the record-setting pace at which Biden was confirming judicial appointees. “I’ve noticed this change,” said TRACY SEFL, the Democratic operative who served as the HILLARY CLINTON 2008 campaign’s Drudge envoy. “But to be honest, it is only after I’m asked about it.” Drudge isn’t a Biden cheerleader. There are still plenty of stories on the site that cast the president in a negative light. Opinion polls reflecting negatively on the president or members of his administration, including Vice President KAMALA HARRIS, regularly get top billing. The site has also blasted Biden’s vaccine mandates (one headline on a vaccine booster story from November asked, “Will It Ever End!”). The conservative media recluse also has not spared Biden from his focus on the health of aging political figures: The president’s physical health and public bouts of coughing tend to get splashed across the top of the page. But the site’s relative disinterest in the president is notable. The news aggregator didn’t mention Biden by name in any link on the site on Friday morning even as he described the jobs numbers as missing expectations. It was at least the second time in the past month that Drudge didn’t have any links directly mentioning the president, according to a West Wing Playbook review. By contrast, web archives of Drudge at the end of Obama’s first year in office featured numerous links to negative and sensationalized stories about the then-president. Top headlines from November and December 2009 touted stories like: “Obama ecstasy pills hit streets in Texas”; Obama’s “frightening insensitivity following shooting”; and “'Welcome to Obamaville' Sign Marks Colorado Homeless Tent City.” At the tail end of the first year of Trump’s presidency, meanwhile, the Drudge Report was filled daily with links to news about the 45th president. On certain days, there would be more than a dozen stories about Trump, his family, and members of his White House team. Often, the coverage was unkind. For reasons that are still unclear, the longtime conservative news recluse soured on Trump (who returned the favor) during the 2020 presidential campaign — either deliberately or inadvertently helping Biden’s campaign against the sitting president. The relationship hasn’t seemed to improve over the last year either. There isn’t any special relationship between the Biden camp and Drudge. Occasionally during the early parts of the 2020 campaign, the Biden team flagged stories for Drudge that they hoped he would highlight. But West Wing Playbook was told this was not a regular occurrence, and another source familiar with those exchanges said they were unaware of any current line of communication between Drudge and the White House. In the years after making his name as the blogger who broke the BILL CLINTON affair in 1998, Drudge created a web ecosystem that drove massive traffic to largely negative stories about Democrats. Reporters and editors at news organizations, salivating at the traffic his links drove to stories, responded by coming up with headlines and story ideas in hopes he would bite. The Obama White House was concerned enough about Drudge that it at one point released a video pushing back against a report on the site about the then-president’s position on private health insurance. They loathed how the site shifted journalists’ focus toward what they saw bizarre and conspiratorial stories. “There's no question Drudge fueled and promulgated the most nefarious conspiracies in Obama's presidency,” said former Obama White House deputy press secretary ERIC SCHULTZ. “That's to be expected from a known right-wing website that is not shy about its agenda. The sad part was when mainstream reporters took the bait. But like many other publishers , Drudge has struggled to keep audiences interested following the traffic sugar high of the Trump administration. Drudge undoubtedly maintains a large and loyal readership for a site that basically hasn’t changed aesthetically since its inception. But by most standards, it simply isn’t the same traffic juggernaut it was. Data shared with POLITICO by the media analytics firm Comscore shows at least one month this year where Drudge dipped under one million unique visitors, a far cry from the millions of readers who frequented the site during the Trump presidency. “I’m not paying the same attention to the site I once needed to, its value is greatly reduced for me and many others,” said Sefl. “Inside a cable newsroom I know it’s different, but the Drudge thumb is simply not pressing as hard on the news cycle scale.” Do you work in the Biden administration? Are you in touch with the White House? Are you MARCO F. SÁNCHEZ, coordinator at the White House office of presidential correspondence? We want to hear from you — and we’ll keep you anonymous. Email us at westwingtips@politico.com or you can text/Signal Alex at 8183240098. |