With help from Allie Bice and Daniel Payne Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. Did someone forward this to you? Subscribe here! Have a tip? Email us at transitiontips@politico.com. President JOE BIDEN’s Supreme Court commission is set to meet for the first time on Wednesday, starting a clock that will require it to produce a report on reforming the court by Nov. 15. Some of the most ardent advocates of expanding the nation’s highest court couldn’t be less excited. “It’s not even on my calendar, because I don’t care,” said BRIAN FALLON, the executive director of Demand Justice, which has called for adding four seats to the Supreme Court and imposing term limits on the justices. Biden pledged to set up the commission during the 2020 campaign under pressure from progressives who have pushed to expand the court after the death of Justice RUTH BADER GINSBURG. President DONALD TRUMP filled Ginsburg’s seat with a conservative justice, tipping the balance on the nine-person court. Fallon and others have complained that a commission will only put out a report, not make recommendations, and that some of its members are conservatives opposed to court expansion. “There’s nothing that they can do that’s going to impress me,” Fallon said. “The whole thing is doomed from the start.” AARON BELKIN, the director of Take Back the Court, which advocates adding additional justices to rebalance the Supreme Court “after its 2016 theft” — a reference to Republicans’ refusal to give President BARACK OBAMA’s nominee MERRICK GARLAND a hearing in Obama’s final year in office — said he wouldn’t be watching the commission’s first meeting closely, either. “I would say I have high hopes and very low expectations,” he said. Reached for comment, the White House pointed out that some progressives as well as conservatives had also praised the commission. The ambivalence on the left to Biden’s court commission came into sharper relief today after the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a Mississippi abortion rights case that could imperil Roe v. Wade. The announcement added even more urgency to progressives’ push to convince Biden to back a Supreme Court revamp — as well as to the campaign to get Justice STEPHEN BREYER to retire. At 82, Breyer is the oldest justice by a decade. (For his part, Breyer, who questioned the idea of expanding the court in a speech at Harvard Law School last month, is set to release a book in September on “how measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it.) Demand Justice has been pressing Breyer to retire for months so Biden can nominate a younger successor. Even some Democratic senators have privately said they’d prefer to see Breyer step down, though they’re been reluctant to speak out on the record. If recent history is any indication, Breyer might not be going anywhere this year. When Justice DAVID SOUTER stepped down in 2009, he announced his retirement on May 1; Justice JOHN PAUL STEVENS, who retired the next year, made an announcement in April. Just two of the past six justices to retire from the court — ANTHONY KENNEDY and SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR — announced their decisions later in the court’s term. “The odds are looking slimmer and slimmer as the days and weeks and months go by,” ARTEMUS WARD , the author of “Deciding to Leave: The Politics of Retirement From the United States Supreme Court,” said in an interview. Fallon argued the Mississippi case has made it even more crucial to replace Breyer, however. “We oughta have a Black woman on the damn court to hear a case like this,” he said, since women of color will be disproportionately affected by the court’s ruling. Biden has promised to make history by nominating a Black woman justice if a spot on the court opens up. Take Back the Court is less concerned with pushing Breyer to retire and more focused on convincing Democratic lawmakers that expanding the Supreme Court is a viable idea. Ironically, support for court expansion could grow if the court eviscerates abortion rights. “Today we have a JOE MANCHIN problem,” Belkin said, referring to the West Virginian who is one of many Democratic senators opposed to expanding the Supreme Court. “But what will the politics look like when the court destroys Roe v. Wade?” “The politics are continuing to shift rapidly and there is a path to expansion,” he added. PSA — We’re going to be experimenting with some new items and sections. Tell us what you like and what you hate. Do you work in the Biden administration? Are you in touch with the White House? Are you JULIA REED? We want to hear from you — and we’ll keep you anonymous: transitiontips@politico.com. Or if you want to stay really anonymous send us a tip through SecureDrop, Signal, Telegram, or Whatsapp here. You can also reach Alex and Theo individually. | 
