Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. With help from producer Raymond Rapada. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Eli | Email Lauren The Reuters union is up in arms over the abrupt dismissal of veteran White House photographer JONATHAN ERNST. Ernst, who worked nearly 20 years for Reuters as a freelance and staff photographer, was fired Wednesday over Teams due to what management described as “gross neglect of duty” following a heated disagreement with White House press aides. According to the union, management claimed that Ernst displayed inappropriate behavior on the evening of Oct. 19, after a press wrangler asked him to leave the Oval Office ahead of President JOE BIDEN’s prime-time national address on the wars in Israel and Ukraine. Ernst, the pool photographer on duty that day, pushed back. He had already set up his equipment. And while he could have operated it remotely, as he saw it, there were enormous risks involved with leaving. The Oval Office was packed with staff, reporters and teleprompter and TV equipment. If his camera were to get knocked over or bumped off angle, the entire press corps would be left without a still shot. Plus, the TV pool was not being asked to leave the room and it’s standard practice for pool photographers to remain in the Oval for presidential addresses. There was an uncomfortable back-and-forth between Ernst and multiple press aides. Voices were raised. But eventually, he was let back in the room as the speech was starting, according to people familiar with the situation. Oval Office addresses are high pressure moments for everyone involved — reporters and White House aides alike. And confrontations with the Biden White House over press access are not uncommon. Ernst and the White House moved on — he even brought the press office homemade chocolate chip cookies the next day as a peace offering. But then Reuters management started asking questions, raising concerns within the union about the outlet’s commitment to backing its own journalist when it comes to advocating for access. According to multiple people familiar with the situation, Reuters editors repeatedly reached out to the White House for information about Ernst’s behavior that night. Over the next few weeks, the company conducted what it described to the union as a “confidential investigation with the White House” that resulted in Ernst’s dismissal. Management declined to share the full findings of the report with Ernst or the union. Reuters did not respond to multiple requests for comment from West Wing Playbook. The White House declined to comment. Some White House press corps members told us that Ernst had made enemies inside the company and management wanted an excuse to get rid of him, especially as the company has sought to cut costs. But Reuters’ eagerness to get the White House involved, and the White House’s participation in the investigation, has worried some reporters that it could lead to a chilling effect. “Through no fault of our own, gathering news happens in tense and confrontational situations. How we conduct ourselves in response is important, but there also needs to be consideration that getting a story or image can happen in heated situations,” TIM MCLAUGHLIN, Reuters Guild chair, wrote in a letter delivered on Friday to Thomson Reuters CEO STEVE HASKER, News President PAUL BASCOBERT and editor-in-chief ALESSANDRA GALLONI, demanding they rescind Ernst’s termination. “Is Reuters telling us that when we receive pushback from a company or the White House that we should act submissively no matter the circumstance? So, if we don’t get the best story or image, that’s okay?” he added. “Every institution we cover will have the blueprint for disrupting Reuters journalists in how they gather news.” McLaughlin also wrote that Ernst did not threaten White House staffers or use inappropriate language. “His behavior was proportional to that of the White House staff.” Some White House reporters say Ernst has a reputation for being a hot-head and that they didn’t doubt he may have overreacted that night. But they also stressed it was his job to push for access. And they noted his booming voice and towering 6’3” frame could often make him come across as more threatening than he intends. Ernst declined to comment for this story, other than to say he was incredibly grateful for the outpouring of support from the D.C. photojournalism community. Many reporters said that despite his outbursts, Ernst could be a wonderful colleague. One called him “one of the kindest, most loyal people and the ultimate team player.” Many expressed sympathy for him being fired without severance. “Jonathan’s colleagues describe him as conscientious and the workhorse of the Washington D.C. photography staff,” McLaughlin wrote in the letter delivered Friday. “Jonathan has a family. He has a young son. Now, he is without a job or severance pay.” MESSAGE US — Are you ALEX DEMOTS, special assistant to the president and deputy staff secretary? We want to hear from you. And we’ll keep you anonymous! Email us at westwingtips@politico.com. Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe here!
|