Editor’s Note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our s each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. President Joe Biden’s Federal Reserve nominees made it through their Senate Banking Committee hearing Thursday largely unscathed. It was a textbook example of why administrations prefer to send nominees up in pairs — or better yet, a trio — to avoid any single person drawing too much heat. Sarah Bloom Raskin, Biden’s pick for Fed vice chair for supervision, took the brunt of Republican questioning, mostly directed at her previous statements on climate change policy. Economist Lisa Cook, a Michigan State professor, took some flak over her views and her qualifications, but much less than one would have expected based on the GOP criticism leading up to the hearing. And Davidson College Professor Philip Jefferson received a warm reception from both sides of the aisle. All in all, it wasn’t clear that any of the nominations are in trouble — though Raskin likely can’t afford to lose any Democratic votes. “Our best guess, based on the hearing, is that Raskin advances to the Senate floor with a 12-12 tie vote in the committee,” Capital Alpha’s Ian Katz said in a note after the hearing. “Cook’s vote could also be a draw, though we think she’s more likely than Raskin to get a Republican supporter.” It’s possible Raskin’s confirmation vote will need to wait until Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), who is recovering from a stroke, is able to participate, Katz added. “This hearing left us convinced that all three nominees are likely to be confirmed,” said Jaret Seiberg, an analyst at Cowen Washington Research Group. A few takeaways from the hearing: —Climate criticism: Raskin spent much of the hearing trying to explain her earlier comments on climate policy and insisting that she does not believe the Fed’s job is to allocate capital to certain favored industries. It didn’t appear to help. “This is one of the most remarkable cases of confirmation conversion I have ever seen,” Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) said at the end of the hearing, insisting that the Fed under Raskin will ultimately impose new restrictions to steer lending away from the oil and gas sector. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on the Senate floor said Raskin “wants unelected bureaucrats to financially bully the private sector into policy changes which lack enough support to become law the honest way.” — Moderate support: Sens. Jon Tester of Montana and Mark Warner of Virginia, two of the panel’s centrist Democrats, both offered positive feedback for the nominees, an important signal for their confirmation prospects. “I think it’s critically important that the Fed gets all the information they can when they’re dealing with risk to our financial system, and I think that it is rather obvious that climate change has to be part of the information that you gather,” Tester said. In a statement after the hearing, Warner said the nominees “have long and varied experiences that make them ideal nominees for the Federal Reserve and I look forward [to] working with them to make sure our economic recovery lifts up all of our communities.” —The master account: One of the trickiest moments for Raskin was her exchange with Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), who questioned whether Raskin used her influence as a former regulator to help a Colorado-based fintech firm, of which she was a board member. At issue is the firm’s access to the Fed’s payments system, something other fintech companies (including Lummis’ constituents) may not have. “Something doesn’t smell right with the way this played out,” Lummis said, but stopped short of saying what she thought Raskin did wrong and didn’t press her to explain her role. “Sarah Bloom Raskin has always taken her ethical obligations very seriously during and after her public service,” White House spokesperson Chris Meagher said in a statement. —The long expansion: All the candidates signaled their willingness to fight elevated inflation. But Jefferson sounded most aligned with Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who has argued that stable prices are necessary to promote a long expansion: “The longer the expansion, the wider they tend to be and the more people are brought into employment and prosperity across socioeconomic groups,” he said. "If I were confirmed, I would very much want to advocate for policies … that would lead to long expansions that are non-inflationary." IT’S FRIDAY — Happy Jobs Day and TGIF. Let’s all remember to take a deep breath when those payroll figures hit. (And keep on reading for a reminder about why we shouldn’t freak out about today’s jobs report.) Meet you back here Monday. Meantime, hit us up with your tips and story ideas: kdavidson@politico.com, aweaver@politico.com, or on Twitter @katedavidson and @aubreeeweaver.
|