THE BACKLASH — Consumers, big investors and much of corporate America have started to align around stakeholder capitalism – the idea that addressing environmental, social and governance issues such as climate change and diversity can drive profits. But where there’s a movement, there’s a backlash. West Virginia last week said it would pull out of a BlackRock Inc. investment fund, making it the first state to cut ties with a firm over its ESG policy. West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore, a Republican, said he can’t do business with a company whose investment strategies harm fossil fuel companies. “These folks aren’t policymakers,” Moore said in an interview. “What if the shape of society that BlackRock wants is not what we want, what West Virginia wants, what other states want, what probably most Americans want?” “People aren’t voting for this at the ballot box,” he said. “They’re using their massive amount of corporate power and capital to coercively push their views of the world onto the rest of us.” Moore is behind a coalition of 15 red states, including Texas, Wyoming and North Dakota, that want to punish banks and asset managers that treat oil and gas companies differently than other businesses. The group, which controls $600 billion in assets, is trying to identify banks “engaged in boycotts” of traditional energy industries. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, also a Republican, signed a law in June requiring state pensions, school endowments, and other funds to sell their holdings in companies that refuse to do business with fossil fuel companies. The state is looking at the entire universe of financial institutions, according to the Texas comptroller's office, which is preparing a list. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick asked that BlackRock be added to the list in a letter last week to state Comptroller Glenn Hegar. “If Wall Street turns their back on Texas and our thriving oil and gas industry, then Texas will not do business with Wall Street,” Patrick wrote. Chris Bryan, a spokesman for Hegar, said it isn’t appropriate to single out a firm until the list is made public. The process has to be transparent, methodical and defensible, he added, and show what companies did to end up on the list. Time out. BlackRock isn’t boycotting fossil fuels. Nor is the rest of Wall Street. “Divesting from entire sectors – or simply passing carbon-intensive assets from public markets to private markets – will not get the world to net zero,” BlackRock CEO Larry Fink wrote in his annual letter to executives earlier this month. Instead, BlackRock and big banks are pressuring corporate clients to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, slash greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate risk. But there are no promises to cut ties with companies that don’t follow through. BlackRock spokesperson Aziz Nayani declined to comment. This fight may be political more than prudential. A growing body of research is showing that adopting ESG policies can be good for business (although the jury is still out on whether it translates into real benefits for people and the planet.) The idea has become more mainstream as executives personally experience the effects of climate change and their employees stage walkouts. Backers of divestment say the backlash from red state regulators and lawmakers is proof the movement is working. For now, the move by Moore in West Virginia has little impact on BlackRock, which has $10 trillion in assets under management. Moore’s office oversees West Virginia’s $8 billion operating fund, only a fraction of which is invested in BlackRock money market funds. He doesn’t control the state’s pension funds, which also invest with BlackRock. Meanwhile, blue-state lawmakers are laying the groundwork for more divestment. A bill in Oregon would require the state treasury to make its holdings public every year so they can be evaluated and possibly sold. State Sen. Jeff Golden, who is co-sponsoring the Oregon legislation, has no sympathy for those opposing divestment efforts. “If we had started this enterprise when we should have 30 years ago, maybe it wouldn’t have come to this conflictual point,” Golden said. |