Editor’s Note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our s each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. The White House and Senate Democrats have mounted an aggressive defense of President Joe Biden’s Federal Reserve nominees over the past few weeks, determined to avoid a repeat derailment of a key financial nomination. It’s a noticeable difference from the nomination process for Saule Omarova, the president’s pick to be Comptroller of the Currency, who withdrew amid fierce opposition from Republicans, the banking industry and several moderate Democrats. While all the Fed nominees seem to have more support than Omarova, the administration isn’t taking anything for granted, sources close to the process tell MM. They lined up statements of support from the left and right ahead of the announcements, and have pushed back particularly hard against criticism of Sarah Bloom Raskin, Biden’s choice to be vice chair for supervision. The White House got some help Tuesday, when the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City issued an unusual statement countering Republicans’ suggestion that Raskin improperly used her influence to help a state-chartered trust company gain access to the central bank’s payment system. From our Victoria Guida: “In a statement dated Feb. 7 , the regional Fed branch said it ‘did not deviate from its review process in evaluating this request’ from Reserve Trust, a payments technology company where Raskin was a board member.” Reserve Trust’s application was eventually approved in 2018 after changing its business model to meet the definition of a depository institution — not after a 2017 phone call from Raskin, the bank said. “It is routine for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City to communicate on an ongoing basis with a requesting organization, its management (including directors), public officials and any relevant federal or state regulatory counterparts,” they said. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), who suggested at last week’s confirmation hearing that the Kansas City Fed approved the application after the call from Raskin, insisted Tuesday that she wasn’t accusing the regional bank of wrongdoing. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), the top Republican on the Banking Committee, has asked Raskin for more details about her role in the application’s approval, and a spokeswoman said Tuesday that the Kansas City Fed should have no problem turning over requested information. “Once again, @SenLummis + @SenToomey throwing everything @ the wall to see what sticks. And nothing is sticking,” White House spokesperson Chris Meagher fired back in a tweet. “So when one false argument backed by no evidence is exposed, they just make up a new one.” The back-and-forth underscores how polarized Federal Reserve nominations have become over the past decade or so. The Senate used to routinely confirm Fed nominees — put forward by presidents of both parties — with large bipartisan support. Raskin is likely to need every last Democratic vote to win confirmation. This is also the first time Democrats have nominated anyone to be the Fed’s vice chair for supervision, a role created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank law and one of the government’s most powerful Wall Street watchdogs. “Even though it’s the Fed … it just feels to me like it’s been turned into a CFPB-like vote in that it’s going to be more partisan in the future because of its bank supervisory role, and the fact that it’s an uber regulator,” said one financial services lobbyist and former Senate aide. A note about process: The Senate Banking Committee is on track to vote next Tuesday on all five of the Fed picks, but it’s looking increasingly likely that Fed Chair Jerome Powell and Governor Lael Brainard may move ahead on their own after that, sources tell MM. Democrats wanted to move all five nominees through the process together, a strategy used often in the nomination process when one nominee (in this case, Powell) is likely to attract more support than the others (namely, Raskin and Lisa Cook). But Raskin and Cook’s confirmation votes will probably need to wait until Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), who is recovering from a stroke, is able to participate. With Powell and Brainard having enough support to win confirmation, Fed watchers have questioned why — and for how long — Democrats would hold back votes on their nominations. IT’S WEDNESDAY — We’re still thinking about this story from WSJ’s Cara Lombardo on Wall Street billionaire Carl Icahn’s secret cause. (Hint: It involves McRib sandwiches and the Humane Society of the United States.) Have a story idea or tip about an eccentric Wall Street or Washington personality? Send it our way: kdavidson@politico.com, aweaver@politico.com, or on Twitter @katedavidson or @aubreeeweaver.
|